Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- en:hahnemann:organon:start [2014/06/19 12:35]
legatum [§ 161 (6th Ed.)]
+++ en:hahnemann:organon:start [2014/06/19 12:59]
legatum [§ 238 (6th Ed.)]
@@ Line 826: / Line 826: @@
 ===== § 169 =====
-{{anchor:s1571}}If, on the first examination of a disease and the first selection of a medicine, we should find that the totality of the symptoms of the disease would not be effectually covered by the disease elements of a single medicine -- owing to the insufficient number of known medicines, -- but that two medicines contend for the preference in point of appropriateness, one of which is more homoeopathically suitable for one part, the other for another part of the symptoms of the disease, it is not advisable, after the employment of the more suitable of the two medicines, to administer the other without fresh examination[({{anchor:s1571b}}and much less to give both together ([[#section272|§ 272]], note))], for the medicine that seemed to be the next best would not, under the change of circumstances that has in the meantime taken place, be suitable for the rest of the symptoms that then remain; in which case, consequently, a more appropriate homoeopathic remedy must be selected in place of the second medicine for the set of symptoms as they appear on a new inspection.
+{{anchor:s1571}}If, on the first examination of a disease and the first selection of a medicine, we should find that the totality of the symptoms of the disease would not be effectually covered by the disease elements of a single medicine -- owing to the insufficient number of known medicines, -- but that two medicines contend for the preference in point of appropriateness, one of which is more homoeopathically suitable for one part, the other for another part of the symptoms of the disease, it is not advisable, after the employment of the more suitable of the two medicines, to administer the other without fresh examination[({{anchor:s1571b}}and much less to give both together ([[#s2140|§ 272]], [[#s2148|note]]))], for the medicine that seemed to be the next best would not, under the change of circumstances that has in the meantime taken place, be suitable for the rest of the symptoms that then remain; in which case, consequently, a more appropriate homoeopathic remedy must be selected in place of the second medicine for the set of symptoms as they appear on a new inspection.
 ===== § 170 =====
@@ Line 966: / Line 966: @@
 ===== § 204 (5th Ed.) =====
-{{anchor:s1691}}If we deduct all chronic affections, ailments and diseases that depend on a persistent unhealthy mode of living, ([[#section77|§ 77]]) as also those innumerable medicinal maladies (v. [[#th_ed38|§ 74]]) caused by the irrational, persistent, harassing and pernicious treatment of diseases often only of trivial character by physicians of the old school, <wrap hi>all the remainder, without exception</wrap>, result from the development of these three chronic miasms, internal syphilis, internal sycosis, but chiefly and in infinitely greater proportion, internal psora, each of which was already in possession of the whole organism, and had penetrated it in all directions before the appearance of the primary, vicarious local symptom of each of them (in the case of psora the scabious eruption, in syphilis the chancre or the bubo, and in sycosis the condylomata) that prevented their outburst; and these chronic miasmatic diseases, if deprived of their local symptom, are inevitably destined by mighty Nature sooner or later to become developed and to burst forth, and thereby propagate all the nameless misery, the incredible number of chronic diseases which have plagued mankind for hundreds and thousands of years, none of which would so frequently have come into existence had physicians striven in a rational manner to cure radically and to extinguish in the organism these three miasms by the internal homoeopathic medicines suited for each of them, without employing topical remedies for their external symptoms. {{anchor:s1694}}(See note to [[#section282|§ 282]]).
+{{anchor:s1691}}If we deduct all chronic affections, ailments and diseases that depend on a persistent unhealthy mode of living, ([[#section77|§ 77]]) as also those innumerable medicinal maladies (v. [[#s1093|§ 74]]) caused by the irrational, persistent, harassing and pernicious treatment of diseases often only of trivial character by physicians of the old school, <wrap hi>all the remainder, without exception</wrap>, result from the development of these three chronic miasms, internal syphilis, internal sycosis, but chiefly and in infinitely greater proportion, internal psora, each of which was already in possession of the whole organism, and had penetrated it in all directions before the appearance of the primary, vicarious local symptom of each of them (in the case of psora the scabious eruption, in syphilis the chancre or the bubo, and in sycosis the condylomata) that prevented their outburst; and these chronic miasmatic diseases, if deprived of their local symptom, are inevitably destined by mighty Nature sooner or later to become developed and to burst forth, and thereby propagate all the nameless misery, the incredible number of chronic diseases which have plagued mankind for hundreds and thousands of years, none of which would so frequently have come into existence had physicians striven in a rational manner to cure radically and to extinguish in the organism these three miasms by the internal homoeopathic medicines suited for each of them, without employing topical remedies for their external symptoms.
 ===== § 204 (6th Ed.) =====
-{{anchor:s1692}}If we deduct all chronic affections, ailments and diseases that depend on a persistent unhealthy mode of living, ([[#section77|§ 77]]) as also those innumerable medicinal maladies (v. [[#th_ed39|§ 74]]) caused by the irrational, persistent, harassing and pernicious treatment of diseases often only of trivial character by physicians of the old school, <wrap hi>most of the remainder of chronic diseases</wrap> result from the development of these three chronic miasms, internal syphilis, internal sycosis, but chiefly and in infinitely greater proportion, internal psora, each of which was already in possession of the whole organism, and had penetrated it in all directions before the appearance of the primary, vicarious local symptom of each of them (in the case of psora the scabious eruption, in syphilis the chancre or the bubo, and in sycosis the condylomata) that prevented their outburst; and these chronic miasmatic diseases, if deprived of their local symptom, are inevitably destined by mighty Nature sooner or later to become developed and to burst forth, and thereby propagate all the nameless misery, the incredible number of chronic diseases which have plagued mankind for hundreds and thousands of years, none of which would so frequently have come into existence had physicians striven in a rational manner to cure radically and to extinguish in the organism these three miasms by the internal homoeopathic medicines suited for each of them, without employing topical remedies for their external symptoms. {{anchor:s1696}}(See note to [[#section282|§ 282]]).
+{{anchor:s1692}}If we deduct all chronic affections, ailments and diseases that depend on a persistent unhealthy mode of living, ([[#section77|§ 77]]) as also those innumerable medicinal maladies (v. [[#s1094|§ 74]]) caused by the irrational, persistent, harassing and pernicious treatment of diseases often only of trivial character by physicians of the old school, <wrap hi>most of the remainder of chronic diseases</wrap> result from the development of these three chronic miasms, internal syphilis, internal sycosis, but chiefly and in infinitely greater proportion, internal psora, each of which was already in possession of the whole organism, and had penetrated it in all directions before the appearance of the primary, vicarious local symptom of each of them (in the case of psora the scabious eruption, in syphilis the chancre or the bubo, and in sycosis the condylomata) that prevented their outburst; and these chronic miasmatic diseases, if deprived of their local symptom, are inevitably destined by mighty Nature sooner or later to become developed and to burst forth, and thereby propagate all the nameless misery, the incredible number of chronic diseases which have plagued mankind for hundreds and thousands of years, none of which would so frequently have come into existence had physicians striven in a rational manner to cure radically and to extinguish in the organism these three miasms by the internal homoeopathic medicines suited for each of them, without employing topical remedies for their external symptoms. <wrap hi>{{anchor:s1696}}(See [[#s2224|note]] to [[#s2223|§ 282]]).</wrap>
 ===== § 205 (5th Ed.) =====
@@ Line 1088: / Line 1088: @@
 ===== § 238 (6th Ed.) =====
-{{anchor:s1834}}Not infrequently, the suitable medicine has with a single dose destroyed several attacks and brought about the return of health, but in the majority of cases, another dose must be administered after such attack. {{anchor:s1835}}Better still, however, when the character of the symptoms has not changed, doses of the same medicine given according to the newer discovery of repetition of doses (see note to § 270), may be given without difficulty in dynamizing each successive dose with 10-12 succussions of the vial containing the medicinal substance. {{anchor:s1838}}Nevertheless, there are at times cases, though seldom, where the intermittent fever returns after several days' well being. {{anchor:s1839}}This return of the same fever after a healthy interval is only possible when the noxious principle that first caused the fever, is still acting upon the convalescent, as is the case in marshy regions. {{anchor:s1840}}Here a permanent restoration can often take place only by getting away from this causative factor, as is possible by seeking a mountainous retreat, if the cause was a marshy fever.
+{{anchor:s1834}}Not infrequently, the suitable medicine has with a single dose destroyed several attacks and brought about the return of health, but in the majority of cases, another dose must be administered after such attack. {{anchor:s1835}}Better still, however, when the character of the symptoms has not changed, doses of the same medicine given according to the newer discovery of repetition of doses (see [[#s2122|note]] to [[#s2085|§ 270]]), may be given without difficulty in dynamizing each successive dose with 10-12 succussions of the vial containing the medicinal substance. {{anchor:s1838}}Nevertheless, there are at times cases, though seldom, where the intermittent fever returns after several days' well being. {{anchor:s1839}}This return of the same fever after a healthy interval is only possible when the noxious principle that first caused the fever, is still acting upon the convalescent, as is the case in marshy regions. {{anchor:s1840}}Here a permanent restoration can often take place only by getting away from this causative factor, as is possible by seeking a mountainous retreat, if the cause was a marshy fever.
 ===== § 239 =====

Legatum Homeopathicum

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools