en:misc:talk-saine-novella
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
en:misc:talk-saine-novella [2013/04/15 08:58] legatum |
en:misc:talk-saine-novella [2013/04/15 08:58] legatum |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
| Now the question he tried to answer -- “Is homeopathy clinically relevant?” Dean reported://“Homeopathy appears mostly as safe as reputed. Homeopathy does appear to be <wrap hi>capable of influencing global outcome</wrap> such as well-being and co-morbidity. Finally, economic benefits are noticeable.”// | Now the question he tried to answer -- “Is homeopathy clinically relevant?” Dean reported://“Homeopathy appears mostly as safe as reputed. Homeopathy does appear to be <wrap hi>capable of influencing global outcome</wrap> such as well-being and co-morbidity. Finally, economic benefits are noticeable.”// | ||
| - | Now, let’s look at the most recent and most comprehensive review ever conducted on the effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness and real world outcome of homeopathy, which is referred to as **“The Swiss Study** that was released in November 2011. It is reported -- //“This is a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) conducted over a period of seven years by scientists for the Swiss government. An HTA is an established scientific procedure, which in contrast with meta-analysis and systematic reviews examines not only the efficacy of homeopathy, but especially “its real-world effectiveness,” its appropriateness, safety and economy.// //HTAs are therefore much wider in scope and politically more informative.// **For the evaluation of the effectiveness of homeopathy all available systematic reviews were examined.** All meta-analyses were prepared by the Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine of the University of Berne (where the Shang study actually came out in 2005), which is specialized on research on public health issues. | + | Now, let’s look at the most recent and most comprehensive review ever conducted on the effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness and real world outcome of homeopathy, which is referred to as **“The Swiss Study”** that was released in November 2011. It is reported -- //“This is a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) conducted over a period of seven years by scientists for the Swiss government. An HTA is an established scientific procedure, which in contrast with meta-analysis and systematic reviews examines not only the efficacy of homeopathy, but especially “its real-world effectiveness,” its appropriateness, safety and economy.// //HTAs are therefore much wider in scope and politically more informative.// **For the evaluation of the effectiveness of homeopathy all available systematic reviews were examined.** All meta-analyses were prepared by the Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine of the University of Berne (where the Shang study actually came out in 2005), which is specialized on research on public health issues. |
| //A total of 22 reviews were analyzed. The synopsis of study results found at least a <wrap hi>trend in favour of homeopathy in 20 of 22 reviews.</wrap>// | //A total of 22 reviews were analyzed. The synopsis of study results found at least a <wrap hi>trend in favour of homeopathy in 20 of 22 reviews.</wrap>// | ||
en/misc/talk-saine-novella.txt · Last modified: 2018/07/24 11:04 by legatum
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
